Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Finlay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Finlay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may be missing something as I know little about gridiron but I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years, so hopefully can get solved now, either way. Boleyn (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as I am not seeing anything that suggests this person was, or is, sufficiently notable for an article. Looking at the article creator and their minimal edit history, I would suspect there is a chance the article was created by the person themself. This is not in itself a reason for deletion, but lack of notability surely is. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lacks evidence that he meets WP:GNG, and his career appears to be unremarkable. PK T(alk) 15:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.